SALIWELL DRY MOUTH SOLUTION RESEARCH PAPERS

dentalmaster3
MEODENTAL_open
Saliwell-Dry-Mouth-Cure

SALIWELL DRY MOUTH SOLUTION RESEARCH PAPERS

ABSTRACTS  OF RESEARCH  PAPERS DONE ON  XEROSTOMIA

 

Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009 Feb 1;14 (2):E76-80. Electro-stimulation in xerostomia

Journal section: Oral Medicine and Pathology

Publication Types: Review

Biotechnological advances in neuro-electro-stimulation for the treatment of

hyposalivation and xerostomia

Gloria Lafaurie 1, Stefano Fedele 2, Rafael Martín-Granizo López 3, Andy Wolff 4, Frank Strietzel 5, Stephen

R. Porter 6, Yrjö T. Konttinen 7

1 Director, Institute UIBO (Unit of Basic Oral Investigation), Dental Faculty, El Bosque University. Bogotá, Colombia

2 Clinical Lecturer, Oral Medicine and Special Needs Dentistry Unit, Division of Maxillofacial Diagnostic, Medical and Surgical

Sciences, Eastman Dental Institute UCL, London, United Kingdom

3 Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain

4 Saliwell Ltd y Assuta Hospital, 2 Hatamar St., Harutzim 60917, Israel

5 Charité – Medical University Berlin. CharitéCentre 3 for Dental Medicine. Department for Oral Medicine, Dental Radiology

and Oral Surgery. Berlin. Germany

6 Academic Head, Oral Medicine and Special Needs Dentistry Unit, Division of Maxillofacial Diagnostic, Medical and Surgical

Sciences, Eastman Dental Institute UCL Professor of Oral Medicine, University of London, London, United Kingdom

7 Professor of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki; Research

Director, ORTON Orthopaedic Hospital of the Invalid Foundation, Helsinki; Research Director, COXA Hospital for Joint

Replacement, Tampere, Finlandia

Correspondence:

Dr. Andy Wolff

Harutzim 60917

Israel

awolff@zahav.net.il

Received: 13/04/2008

Accepted: 11/06/2008

Lafaurie G, Fedele S, Martín-Granizo-López R, Wolff A, Strietzel F,

Porter SR, Konttinen YT. Biotechnological advances in neuro-electrostimulation

for the treatment of hyposalivation and xerostomia. Med

Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009 Feb 1;14 (2):E76-80.

http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/v14i2/medoralv14i2p76.pdf

Abstract

Treatment of xerostomia is a common clinical challenge in the oral medicine practice. Although some treatments

have been used to improve the symptoms of xerostomia, none is completely satisfactory for the patients who suffer

of this alteration. In the last years non-pharmacological treatments based on electro-stimulation for the treatment

of xerostomia have been developed. This review is aimed at presenting new developments for the treatment

of xerostomia, applying neuro-electro-stimulation by miniaturized intra-oral electro-stimulators. These devices

increase salivary secretion and improve symptoms of oral dryness. Their effect is obtained by means of stimulation

of the lingual nerve, in whose proximity the electrodes of the apparatus are placed. The objective of this

mechanism is both to directly stimulate the salivary glands controlled by that nerve and to enhance the salivary

reflex. Clinical studies have been carried out that have demonstrated the wetting effect of the method described

in this article.

Key words: Xerostomia, electro-stimulation, hyposalivation, saliva, dry mouth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM

Vol. 63, No. 1, January 2011, pp 180–190

DOI 10.1002/art.27766

© 2011, American College of Rheumatology

Efficacy and Safety of an Intraoral Electrostimulation Device

for Xerostomia Relief

A Multicenter, Randomized Trial

Frank P. Strietzel,1 Gloria I. Lafaurie,2 Gloria R. Bautista Mendoza,2 Ivan Alajbeg,3

Slavica Pejda,3 Lea Vuletic´,3 Rube´n Mantilla,4 Denise P. Falca˜o,5 Soraya C. Leal,5

Ana C. Barreto Bezerra,5 Simon D. Tran,6 Henri A. Me´nard,7 Suguru Kimoto,8 Shaoxia Pan,9

Rafael A. Martı´n-Granizo,10 M. Lourdes Maniegas Lozano,10 Susan L. Zunt,11

Cheryl A. Krushinski,11 Dario Melilli,12 Giuseppina Campisi,12 Carlo Paderni,12 Sonia Dolce,12

Juan F. Yepes,13 Liselott Lindh,14 Meltem Koray,15 Gonca Mumcu,16 Sharon Elad,17

Itai Zeevi,17 Beatriz C. Aldape Barrios,18 Rodrigo M. Lo´pez Sa´nchez,18 Ben Z. Beiski,19

Andy Wolff,19 and Yrjo¨ T. Konttinen20

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an

intraoral electrostimulation device, consisting of stimulating

electrodes, an electronic circuit, and a power

source, in treating xerostomia. The device delivers electrostimulation

through the oral mucosa to the lingual

nerve in order to enhance the salivary reflex.

Methods. The device was tested on a sample of

patients with xerostomia due to Sjo¨gren’s syndrome and

other sicca conditions in a 2-stage prospective, randomized,

multicenter trial. Stage I was a double-blind,

crossover stage designed to compare the effects of the

electrically active device with the sham device, each used

for 1 month, and stage II was a 3-month open-label

stage designed to assess the long-term effects of the

active device. Improvement in xerostomia severity from

baseline was the primary outcome measure.

Results. A total of 114 patients were randomized.

In stage I, the active device performed better than the

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00509808.

Drs. Tran and Me´nard’s work was supported by funding from

the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to McGill University

(CIHR Program to Stimulate International Research Initiatives). Dr.

Lindh’s work was supported by funding from the Swedish Laryng

Foundation to Malmo¨ University. Dr. Konttinen’s work was supported

by funding from the Academy of Finland, Finska La¨karesa¨llskapet,

Helsinki University Central Hospital, and the ORTON Foundation to

the University of Helsinki. Saliwell Ltd. (Harutzim, Israel) provided

the intraoral electrostimulation devices for the study at no charge.

1Frank P. Strietzel, MD, DDS: Charite´ Universita¨tsmedizin

Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 2Gloria I. Lafaurie, DDS, Gloria R. Bautista

Mendoza, MS Statistics: Universidad El Bosque, Bogota´, Colombia;

3Ivan Alajbeg, DMD, PhD, Slavica Pejda, DDM, Lea Vuletic´, DMD:

University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Rube´n Mantilla, MD: Clı´nica

de Artritis y Rehabilitacio´n, Bogota´, Colombia; 5Denise P. Falca˜o,

MHS, Soraya C. Leal, PhD, Ana C. Barreto Bezerra, DMD, PhD:

Universidade de Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil; 6Simon D. Tran, DMD,

PhD: McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 7Henri A. Me´-

nard, MD: McGill University and McGill University Health Center,

Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 8Suguru Kimoto, DDS, PhD: Nihon

University School of Dentistry at Mastudo, Mastudo, Japan; 9Shaoxia

Pan, DMD: Hospital of Stomatology and Peking University, Beijing,

China; 10Rafael A. Martı´n-Granizo, MD, M. Lourdes Maniegas

Lozano, MD, DMD: Hospital Clı´nico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain;

11Susan L. Zunt, DDS, MS, Cheryl A. Krushinski, DDS: Indiana

University, Indianapolis; 12Dario Melilli, DMD, Giuseppina Campisi,

DMD, PhD, Carlo Paderni, DMD, Sonia Dolce, DMD: Universita` di

Palermo, Palermo, Italy; 13Juan F. Yepes, DDS, MD, MPH: University

of Kentucky, Lexington; 14Liselott Lindh, DDS, PhD: Malmo¨ University,

Malmo¨, Sweden; 15Meltem Koray, DDS, PhD: Istanbul University,

Istanbul, Turkey; 16Gonca Mumcu, DDS, PhD: University of

Marmara, Istanbul, Turkey; 17Sharon Elad, DMD, MSc, Itai Zeevi,

DMD: Hebrew University Hadassah School of Dental Medicine,

Jerusalem, Israel; 18Beatriz C. Aldape Barrios, DDS, Rodrigo M.

Lo´pez Sa´nchez, DDS: Universidad Nacional Auto´noma de Mexico,

Mexico City, Mexico; 19Ben Z. Beiski, MS, Andy Wolff, DMD: Saliwell

Ltd., Harutzim, Israel; 20Yrjo¨ T. Konttinen, MD, PhD: Helsinki

University Central Hospital, University of Helsinki, and ORTON

Orthopaedic Hospital, Helsinki, and COXA Hospital for Joint Replacement,

Tampere, Finland.

Dr. Zunt served as principal investigator in a study funded by

Parion Sciences. Mr. Beiski and Dr. Wolff own stock in Saliwell Ltd.

and hold patents as coinventors of intraoral electronic medical devices.

Address correspondence to Andy Wolff, DMD, Saliwell Ltd.,

65 Hatamar Street, Harutzim 60917, Israel. E-mail: awolff@zahav.

net.il.

Submitted for publication April 14, 2010; accepted in revised

form September 21, 2010.

180

 

 

 

The Burden of Xerostomia in Independent

Community-dwelling Older Adults:

Results from the Saliwell Project

Laxman Nayaka, AndyWolffb, Stefano Fedelec, Rafael Martin-Granizod, Peter A. Reicharte,

Lucio Lo Russoc, Michele Mignognac, Frank Strietzele, and the Saliwell Study Group

aCentre for Applied Gerontology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

bHospital Dentistry Department, Assuta Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel.

cOral Medicine Section, Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, University ‘‘Federico II’’ of

Naples, Naples, Italy.

dOral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

eOral Surgery, CharitØ-UniversitWtsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

fThe Saliwell Study Group includes the following researchers: Ben Z. Beiski from Assuta Hospital, Tel Aviv; Amichay Ziv,

Eitan Hod and David Alon from Aran, Tel Aviv; Eytan Ofry and Yael Shklarsky from Relsoft, Tel Aviv; Oliver Scholz, Thomas

Velten, Klaus Peter Koch and Oliver Steinmetz from Fraunhofer Institute, St. Ingbert, Germany; Michael Rinck from MTPromedt,

St. Ingbert, Germany; Hakan Lindstrom from Nobel Biocare, Goteborg, Sweden; Philippe Clot and Stephan Kolly

from Valtronic SA, Les Charbonnieres, Switzerland.

Purpose: The Saliwell Project was a European Research Consortium initiative aimed at developing an intraoral device to treat dry

mouth by electroneurostimulation. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the burden of xerostomia in independent

community-dwelling older adults using quantitative and qualitative analyses, as a preliminary phase of the project.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional postal questionnaire survey was carried out involving 1,000 adults aged 60 years

and above, randomly selected from the Birmingham University Thousand Elders database. The questionnaire format was

designed at two focus groups’ meetings involving people with chronic xerostomia. Age, gender, chronic medical conditions

and number of prescribed medications consumed daily, as well as dental, oral and general health status, Geriatric Oral Health

Assessment Index (GOHAI), Xerostomia Inventory (XI), chewing capability and dry mouth questions were evaluated.

Results: Seven hundred and seventy completed questionnaires were available for analyses. There were 274 males and 496

females (age range 60 to 85). The overall prevalence of xerostomia (subjective complaints of dry mouth) was 15.5%. A

logistic regression analysis showed that the following factors significantly (P_0.05) contributed to xerostomia: gender; number

of prescribed medications; complaints of anxiety, digestive, bladder and osteoporosis problems; oral health satisfaction

level and perceived general health status.

Conclusions: The overall prevalence of xerostomia as well as its risk factors was in agreement with the previously published

studies. Since chronic xerostomia is a distressing disorder with significant impact on oral health satisfaction and general health

status, a comprehensive treatment of xerostomia should carefully consider patients’ perspectives and behaviours.

Key words: Xerostomia, older adults, GOHAI, XI

Oral Biosci Med 2004; 4: 00-00 Submitted for publication 6 August 2004; accepted for publication 8 November 2004.

INTRODUCTION

Xerostomia has frequently been associated with salivary

gland hypofunction and concomitant loss in the

quality of life for sufferers (Fox et al, 1987; Sreebny

Vol 4,

Oral Diseases (2007) 13, 206–213. doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01268.x

_ 2006 Blackwell Munksgaard All rights reserved

http://www.blackwellmunksgaard.com

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Electrostimulating device in the management

of xerostomia

FP Strietzel1, R Martı´n-Granizo2, S Fedele3,5, L Lo Russo3, M Mignogna3, PA Reichart1, A Wolff4

1Abteilung fu¨r Oralchirurgie und Zahna¨rzliche Ro¨ntgenologie, Charite´ – Universita¨tsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum,

Germany; 2Servicio de Cirugla Oral y Maxilofacial, Hospital Clı´nico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; 3Dipartmento di Scienze

Odontostamatologiche e Maxillo-Facciali, Universita` di Napoli Federico II, Italy; 4Saliwell Ltd, Assuta Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel;

5Oral Medicine Unit, Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, University of London, UK

INTRODUCTION: The present study was undertaken to

evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a recently developed

electrostimulating device mounted on an individualized

intra-oral removable appliance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The device, containing

electrodes, a wetness sensor, an electronic circuit and a

power source, was tested on patients with xerostomia in a

crossover, randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded,

multicenter study. Electrical stimulation and also sham

were delivered during 10 min to the oral mucosa, in the

mandibular third molar region. Oral dryness was measured

by the sensor. As the primary outcome, sensor dryness

and xerostomia symptom changes as a result of device

wearing were assessed, and compared between active and

sham modes. In addition, side-effects were recorded.

RESULTS: Electrostimulation resulted in a significant

decrease in sensor dryness, leading to a beneficial effect

on patients’ subjective condition. No significant sideeffects

were observed.

Oral Diseases (2007) 13, 206–213